Security for vibe-coded apps and software.
Engineered for the audits AI never ran.

Security audits and compliance engineering by IrenicTech: vibe-coded app reviews (Cursor, Copilot, v0, Lovable, Bolt) plus SOC 2 readiness, HIPAA, GDPR, PCI DSS, and application security engineering
  • React
  • Flutter
  • Swift
  • Kotlin
  • Next.js
  • TypeScript
  • Node.js
  • Tailwind CSS
  • Express
  • PostgreSQL
  • MongoDB
  • Redis
  • OpenAI
  • Anthropic
  • Hugging Face
  • LangChain
  • PyTorch
  • TensorFlow
  • AWS
  • Google Cloud
  • Microsoft Azure
  • Vercel
  • Cloudflare
  • Docker

IrenicTech security and compliance at a glance

Security by design. Not patched after the breach.

Through 2024 and 2025, the AI-built app breach pattern became hard to miss. Hardcoded API keys committed to public repos. JWT middleware that decoded the token but never verified the signature. Open S3 buckets the AI suggested for “easy uploads” with customer PII inside. SQL injection in AI-generated query builders. Typosquatted or outright malicious dependencies the AI pulled in. Every week, a fresh news cycle. The fix is not a better AI tool; the fix is having a human security engineer read the code before users do.

We build security and compliance services around one principle: build it secure from sprint one, do not patch it after the breach. Audit logs in the data model on day one. Access controls enforced by the database, not by app code a junior engineer can bypass. AI-generated code reviewed with the same lens we review human-written code. Evidence collected as the side effect of the deploy pipeline, not as a quarterly project before the auditor arrives.

The teams we work with do not want a security veneer for the auditor or a security disclaimer at the bottom of their AI-built MVP. They want a platform that survives a real user, a curious attacker, a third-party audit, and an enterprise vendor questionnaire.

Productized engagements

Fixed-scope security & compliance sprints. Buyable, not negotiable.

Time-boxed, fixed-price, with a deliverable that lands as audit-ready evidence, a closed remediation backlog, or a passing readiness review. Every sprint hands you the policies, the runbooks, and the CI gates on day one.

  • For any app pre-launch

    App Security Audit Sprint

    Audit, remediate, and gate the next commit in six weeks.

    • Threat model and manual code review (including vibe-coded paths AI cannot reliably reason about)
    • SAST, SCA, secret, and dependency scanning wired into CI gating deploy
    • Critical and high findings remediated as PRs you can review
    Book a discovery call
  • For founders

    SOC 2 Readiness Sprint

    From current state to audit-ready in twelve weeks.

    • Gap analysis against the trust services criteria
    • Audit log, access review, and change management gates in the deploy pipeline
    • Policy templates and evidence-collection automation set up with Drata, Vanta, or direct
    Book a discovery call
  • For regulated industries

    Compliance Engineering Sprint

    HIPAA, GDPR, or PCI DSS engineering in eight to twelve weeks, before the regulator asks.

    • Data inventory, lawful basis review, and data subject rights workflows
    • Encryption, key management, and access logging mapped to the regulation
    • Vendor assessment templates, DPA or BAA review, and partner-firm coordination
    Book a discovery call

Our security & compliance deliverables

  • SOC 2 readiness

    Gap analysis, control mapping to the trust services criteria, evidence-collection automation via Drata, Vanta, or Secureframe, policy templates, and the deploy-pipeline gates that turn audit time into documentation review.

  • HIPAA & PHI handling

    BAAs with every PHI-touching processor, encryption at rest and in transit, access logging, audit trail, and the technical safeguards the OCR enforcement program looks for.

  • GDPR & data subject rights

    Data inventory, lawful basis review, consent flows, deletion and portability workflows, and the data processor agreements your customers' procurement teams ask for in week one.

  • PCI DSS scope minimization

    Card data handled by Stripe, Adyen, or Braintree so card numbers never touch your infrastructure. PCI scope kept to SAQ A wherever the integration shape allows it.

  • Application security audits

    Threat modeling, manual code review on critical paths (including AI-generated code from Cursor, Copilot, v0, Lovable, Bolt). SAST via Semgrep and CodeQL, SCA via Snyk and Dependabot, secret scanning via Gitleaks and TruffleHog, DAST via OWASP ZAP, all wired into CI gating deploy. Prioritised remediation backlog at the end.

  • Secret management & encryption

    AWS Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault, or Doppler. Key rotation strategy, encryption at rest and in transit, and the secret-in-code prevention pattern that catches AI-suggested 'just hardcode it for now' at pre-commit.

  • Audit-ready logging

    Comprehensive event log queryable per tenant, retained per the compliance regime, and surfaced in the admin panel so customers can self-serve their own audit needs.

  • Incident response engineering

    Runbooks for the top expected failure modes, on-call rotation in PagerDuty or Opsgenie, communication templates for the regulator-letter scenario, and tabletop exercises to practice them before the real one.

  • Snyk
  • Dependabot
  • GitHub
  • OWASP
  • HashiCorp Vault
  • AWS Secrets Manager
  • PagerDuty
  • Opsgenie
  • Snyk
  • Dependabot
  • GitHub
  • OWASP
  • HashiCorp Vault
  • AWS Secrets Manager
  • PagerDuty
  • Opsgenie
  • Snyk
  • Dependabot
  • GitHub
  • OWASP
  • HashiCorp Vault
  • AWS Secrets Manager
  • PagerDuty
  • Opsgenie

Patch-on-breach vs security by design

Why most apps only get serious about security after the first incident.

Two ways to ship security. One builds it in from sprint one and gates every change. The other ships fast, hopes for the best, and patches what users (or attackers) find first.

The default pattern

Patch-on-breach

Security becomes a project the morning after a vulnerability ships or an audit fails. The breach gets patched, the next vulnerability lands, the cycle repeats.

  • Security work happens the quarter before an audit, or the morning after a breach hits production.
  • AI-generated code lands without review; vulnerabilities are discovered when an attacker or a security researcher finds them first.
  • Hardcoded API keys leak in commits, get rotated under pressure, leak again two months later because the prevention pattern was never put in place.
  • Policies live in a Google Doc nobody reads; the engineering team has no idea what the policy says they do.
  • Logs are 'we keep CloudWatch for thirty days' until the regulator (or the post-mortem) asks for a year.
  • Incident response plan is a wiki page from 2022, never tested, written by someone who has left.

How we ship

IrenicTech security by design

Controls in the data model, AI-generated code reviewed before merge, secrets managed by Vault, evidence as a deploy-pipeline side effect.

  • Security treated as code: audit logs in the data model, access controls enforced by the database, controls versioned and reviewed.
  • AI-generated code reviewed at PR time; SAST, SCA, and secret scanning gates run before merge, not after launch.
  • Secrets managed by Vault or AWS Secrets Manager; pre-commit hooks block the 'just hardcode it for now' AI suggestion before it lands.
  • Policies live in your wiki and reference the actual systems they govern; the engineering team operates them daily.
  • Logs structured, queryable per tenant, retained per the compliance regime, surfaced in the admin panel.
  • Incident response runbooks tested via tabletop exercise, refreshed each quarter, owned by the on-call team that runs them.

Where engineered security earns its place.

  1. 01 · SOC 2

    B2B SaaS preparing for SOC 2

    Pre-audit gap analysis, control implementation, evidence-collection automation. Audit time becomes documentation review rather than a quarter-long project. Renewal audits become a maintenance task.

    See our SaaS Platforms practice
  2. 02 · Healthcare

    HIPAA-aware healthcare SaaS

    PHI handling, BAA management with every processor, access logging, audit trail, and the OCR-defensible posture a healthcare customer's procurement team expects to see in week one of the trial.

  3. 03 · Fintech

    Regulated payments and PCI scope

    PCI DSS scope minimization (card data handled by Stripe or Adyen so card numbers never touch you), KYC/AML integration where required, fraud monitoring, and the regulator-letter response plan.

  4. 04 · GDPR

    EU and global GDPR posture

    Data subject rights workflows (access, deletion, portability, rectification), lawful basis review, processor and sub-processor agreements, cross-border transfer plumbing where the case demands it.

  5. 05 · Vibe-coded MVP

    Pre-launch audit for an AI-built app

    Founder shipped the MVP fast with Cursor, v0, Lovable, or Bolt. Before real users arrive, we audit the AI-generated code for the patterns AI gets wrong: broken auth, hardcoded keys, SQL injection in the 20% case, open S3 buckets.

  6. 06 · Incident response

    Pre-incident incident response

    Runbooks for the top expected failure modes, on-call rotation in PagerDuty or Opsgenie, regulator-letter templates, and a tabletop exercise practiced before the real incident, not after.

Security & compliance work shipped

What we have shipped into production.

A short, honest cut of security and compliance work that landed in production for real customers. The controls, the evidence pipelines, the audit reports, the operational patterns we know work because we built and operated them.

  • SOC 2 Type II readiness

    Vertical SaaS from current state to audit-ready in twelve weeks

    Gap analysis against the trust services criteria, control implementation in the deploy pipeline, evidence-collection automation via Drata. Year-2 renewal audit became a documentation review, not a project. Engineering team owns the controls year-round.

  • HIPAA-aware infrastructure

    PHI-handling guardrails baked into the deploy gate

    Tenant-isolated AWS accounts via Organizations, BAA management with every PHI-touching processor, access logging with per-tenant query, audit-firm-ready documentation. PHI never leaves the account boundary the deploy gate enforces.

  • Vibe-coded app hardening

    Cursor-built MVP audited and gated before launch

    Founder shipped the MVP in three weeks with Cursor and v0. We found 47 issues (11 critical) in a two-week audit: SQL injection, hardcoded API key, broken JWT, open S3 bucket. All fixed before launch. Pre-merge gates so the next AI-generated commit cannot reopen them.

  • Incident response engineering

    Runbooks tested via tabletop before the real incident

    Top-10 failure-mode runbooks, on-call rotation in PagerDuty, regulator-letter templates drafted, tabletop exercise practiced with the engineering team. When the real incident hit, total downtime was forty minutes and the regulator notification went out the same business day.

Voice of the customer

From founders and security leads who passed the audit.

  • We hit SOC 2 Type II in twelve weeks. The auditor said the evidence-collection automation was the most complete they had seen in the segment. Renewal audits since have been documentation reviews, not projects.

    Hugo Carrington

    COO, Marblehead Health

  • Built the MVP in three weeks with Cursor. Hired IrenicTech for a pre-launch audit. They found 47 issues, 11 of them critical. We fixed everything before launch and have not had a single security incident in the six months since.

    Felix Nyström

    Founder, Larkwood Studio

  • The tabletop exercise saved us. When the real incident hit, the runbook was already written, the regulator template was already drafted, and the on-call rotation actually picked up the phone. Total downtime: forty minutes.

    Erik Thorvaldsen

    VP Engineering, Pinemoor Markets

Honest scope

Not a fit if…

The honest filter. If any of these describe you, we will say so on the discovery call and point you to a firm that fits better. The call is free either way.

  • You want paperwork-only SOC 2 outsourcing without the engineering work. Vanta or Secureframe do this better than we do.
  • You are looking for a pure penetration-testing firm with independence from the codebase. Trail of Bits, NCC Group, or Cure53 are the right call.
  • You need a 24/7 SOC or MSSP-style monitoring relationship. That is not our model; we hand off to your on-call team after the engagement.
  • You want a security audit you can show a customer without actually fixing what we find. We do the engineering work, not the marketing.

How we ship security and compliance engagements.

Six steps from first call to an audit-corrected, monitored production system. The pre-audit readiness review gates the audit; the post-audit retainer keeps the controls from drifting back to aspirational.

  1. 01

    Discovery & gap analysis

    Current state, applicable frameworks, customer commitments, evidence-collection state. One-page brief and a prioritised gap register. No production changes yet.

  2. 02

    Control design & threat model

    Controls mapped to the framework, threat model documenting the attacks we are defending against, audit-log schema, encryption and key strategy.

  3. 03

    Engineering build

    Audit logs in the data model, access controls enforced by the database, encryption and secret management, SAST and DAST in CI, deploy-pipeline gates wired up.

  4. 04

    Evidence automation

    Pipelines that collect SOC 2 or HIPAA evidence as side effects of the engineering work. Audit-firm-ready documentation, runbooks, test-coverage report.

  5. 05

    Pre-audit readiness review

    Internal mock audit, gap remediation, auditor selection (Drata, Vanta, or direct relationships with the major firms), and the engagement-letter prep.

  6. 06

    Audit & ongoing

    We engage the audit firm with you, run the remediation cycle, and ship the audit-corrected build. Post-launch retainer for continuous compliance and incident response.

The frameworks we engineer to.

The standards we measure ourselves against, and the ones we engineer into the platforms we hand off. Designed in from sprint one, not retrofitted before the first audit.

Pre-audit readiness reviews, vibe-coded app audits, and security architecture reviews available as standalone engagements. Bring your current state, leave with a prioritised remediation backlog.

Common questions, answered.

  • How long does a SOC 2 readiness engagement take?

    SOC 2 Readiness Sprint: twelve weeks from current state to audit-ready (gap analysis through evidence automation). The audit cycle adds four to eight weeks for the auditor's work. Annual renewal becomes a documentation review, not a fresh project.

  • What does a security and compliance engagement cost?

    Price varies with the scope of the work. The productized sprints are fixed-price for the scope they cover. For scale reference: an App Security Audit Sprint typically runs four to six weeks, a SOC 2 Readiness Sprint runs ten to fourteen weeks (then a four-to-eight-week auditor cycle), and a Compliance Engineering Sprint for a single framework runs eight to twelve weeks. A full multi-framework engagement is quoted after the discovery call. The discovery call itself is free; you accept the estimate or you do not.

  • Do you audit vibe-coded apps built with Cursor, v0, Lovable, or Bolt?

    Yes. The App Security Audit Sprint is built for both human-written code and AI-generated code. The patterns AI gets wrong repeat across tools: SQL injection in the 20% case, broken auth in multi-step flows, hardcoded keys in 'helpful' examples, dependencies pulled in without vetting, open buckets suggested for 'easy uploads'. We audit, remediate, and gate the next AI-generated commit so it cannot reopen the issues.

  • Why is now the right time to audit an AI-built app?

    Because the breach pattern is now obvious. Through 2024 and 2025, AI-built apps shipped with the same set of repeating vulnerabilities: hardcoded API keys leaked in committed .env files, broken JWT validation that decoded but never verified, open S3 buckets suggested for 'easy uploads' with customer PII inside, SQL injection in AI-generated query builders, malicious or typosquatted dependencies the AI pulled in. Every week brings another news cycle. The fix is not a better AI tool; the fix is having a human security engineer review the AI's output before users (or attackers) find what AI missed.

  • Do you do the audit, or just prepare for it?

    Prepare for it. The audit is by a third-party firm (Drata or Vanta + their auditor partners, or direct relationships with the major audit firms). We engage the audit firm with you, run the remediation cycle, and ship the audit-corrected build. We deliberately do not market ourselves as an audit firm because we cannot be independent for our own work.

  • Which frameworks do you have experience with?

    SOC 2 Type II is the default for B2B SaaS. HIPAA when PHI is in scope. PCI DSS when card data touches the infrastructure (we usually architect so it does not). GDPR for EU-touching customers. ISO 27001 when enterprise procurement asks. OWASP ASVS as the application security baseline. NIST 800-53 for federal-adjacent buyers.

  • Do you offer penetration testing?

    We do code review and threat modeling, and we manage the engagement with a top external pen-test firm (Trail of Bits, NCC Group, Cure53, Doyensec). We do not market ourselves as a pen-test firm because we are not independent for code we have audited or built ourselves.

  • What is your stance on tools like Drata, Vanta, Secureframe?

    Useful for evidence collection and continuous monitoring; not a substitute for the engineering work. We integrate them into the deploy pipeline so they collect the right evidence automatically. The compliance posture comes from the controls; the tool just records them.

  • Can we get a security review before signing a new enterprise customer?

    Yes. Pre-deal security review covers the prospective customer's vendor questionnaire, gap analysis against their stated requirements, and a prioritised remediation backlog for the open items. The faster you respond to questionnaires the faster enterprise deals close.

  • How do you handle incident response after the engagement?

    Runbooks documented, on-call rotation set up, regulator-letter templates drafted. We run a tabletop exercise with your team before handover. Optional incident response retainer for the first regulated breach if your team prefers external coverage on the early ones.

  • Who owns the documentation, the runbooks, and the audit relationships?

    You. From day one. Policies in your wiki, runbooks in your incident response tool, audit relationships in your name. We push to your repos and wiki, document everything in your account. No proprietary platform you cannot leave; no ongoing dependency on us unless you want one.

Start a conversation

Tell us what you’re building.

Share the essentials and we’ll reply within 4 hours with a real next step, not an auto-responder.

What happens next

  1. We reply within 4 hours, from a real person, not an auto-responder.
  2. A short scoping call to understand the goal, constraints, and timeline.
  3. A fixed-scope discovery sprint: a working prototype and a written estimate.
Office
Austin, TX, United States
Hours
Mon–Fri · Async + scheduled calls

Fields marked are required.